Forward Deployed Engineer
AI changes many technical workflows. The valuable person understands the problem, talks to stakeholders, uses agents, verifies outputs, and owns a working system.
Read postThese wiki posts give the course concrete stories: why AI literacy matters, what human judgment still controls, and how students can turn agent-assisted work into evidence.
Use these for a short opening discussion, not a full reading assignment. The goal is to show students that AI literacy is about problem definition, collaboration, verification, and shipping useful work.
AI changes many technical workflows. The valuable person understands the problem, talks to stakeholders, uses agents, verifies outputs, and owns a working system.
Read postA domain expert with a clear problem can outperform faster coders. Students should learn to specify the right thing before asking an agent to build.
Read postFluent users manage AI rather than delegate blindly: they iterate, ask for missing context, critique polished output, and keep responsibility for the work.
Read postUse these to connect agent setup, human review, and responsible use. Keep provocative claims instructor-framed unless sources are reverified before class.
Useful for macro-action thinking: students direct agents through goals, context, tools, branches, and review rather than only typing code by hand.
Read postAI reduces syntax friction but makes specification, architecture, diagnosis, and review more important. This supports the whole agent-based course design.
Read postStudent-facing case for cognitive load, tool switching, verification fatigue, and why a small deliberate AI stack can beat more tools.
Read postReturn to this as a full app-building case: before students prompt an agent, they must define audience, workflow, constraints, and success criteria.
Read postUse when students hit app complexity. The issue is often not "how do I code it?" but "did I choose the right structure?"
Read postAgent workflow for evaluating postings, tailoring materials, tracking applications, and preserving human control. Good homework case: do not auto-submit.
Read postStudents should show prompts, setup, agent instructions, tests, and verification habits, not just polished screenshots of final projects.
Read postOptional study-skills case: learning works better when AI connects vocabulary or facts to authentic context rather than isolated memorization.
Read postUse as compact prompt-review moves after students learn structured prompts: ask for missing context, disagreement, uncertainty, and critique.
Read postOptional extension for bilingual students and model-behavior discussion. Verify numeric research claims before teaching them as facts.
Read postThese belong mainly in the hidden teacher-training chapter. They are about educator workflows, feedback, rubrics, and the line between support and outsourcing.
Frames AI as a teacher material-production system: custom activities, rubrics, examples, and differentiated supports.
Read postUse for instructor-only discussion of rubric-grounded feedback, privacy, academic integrity, and human responsibility in grading.
Read postUse as a teacher-facing rubric input: look for iteration, critical review, uncertainty handling, and collaboration settings.
Read postUse teacher-selected excerpts. These are useful for evidence quality and expert verification, but too specialized for required CS-215 reading without simplification.
Evidence-quality case: how should students read model-risk claims, vendor claims, restricted-access claims, and independent evaluations?
Read postAdvanced case in evaluation and AI research workflows. Useful for discussing benchmark integrity and scalable oversight.
Read postHigh-stakes caution case. Use for ethics discussion only, not student emulation or workflow imitation.
Read postOptional domain application for finance/time series. Too specialized for required Excel/admin workflow.
Read postAdvanced architecture and skepticism example. Keep out of core flow unless students are ready for attention/computation tradeoffs.
Read postCase for human expertise in low-level AI-assisted coding. Useful later, but not required for CS-215.
Read postFor students who want ML fundamentals. Good enrichment, but not central to the agent-app course path.
Read post